Twitter argues that by promoting Google+ in search results, Google isn’t providing the most relevant social results. Meanwhile, Google has implied it would promote more pages from Twitter if it had adequate permission to do so. Twitter general council Alex Macgillivray then tweeted an example of why he thought Google’s new results were inefficient: Google search results for the search term “@WWE” — yes, with the “@” symbol — that did not include the organization’s Twitter page.

Now Google has confirmed to Mashable that it has never indexed the “@” symbol. In other words, the search engine has never recognized a Twitter handle when it was formatted that way.

So while a search for “WWE Twitter” still returns the organization’s Twitter feed before its Google+ page, “@WWE” returns the same results as “WWE” — in this case, with Google+ results first. Somehow a search for “+WWE” succeeds in returning a Google+ profile.

But really, Google? The company with a car that drives itself? In more than five years of people searching for Twitter handles, you never got around to adding the @ symbol to your index?

Even without the @ sign being indexed, however, the concern over the results for “@WWE” are valid: About 24,900 people have +1ed or added WWE to their circles on Google+ — but 792,642 people follow WWE on Twitter. In this case, and many others, the Twitter page is a more relevant social result than the Google+ page. Twitter ranks higher than Google+ for the WWE in Yahoo, AOL and Bing results.

On the other hand, Twitter and Facebook haven’t necessarily made it easy for the search engine to feature them in results. Facebook denies Google’s crawlers access to its private pages, for one obvious reason — they’re private. Twitter includes “nofollow” links on its pages that make it hard for Google’s crawlers to index them.

As Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan has pointed out, Google has indexed at least 3 billion pages. But Twitter users create 200 million Tweets every day that would be hard to index without access to the network’s firehose — access to which Google lost with expiration of an agreement last July.

In the end, exactly how Google search results came to be dominated by Google+ pages — either as a result of having little access to other social networks or by intentionally ignoring them — isn’t that important. The important question is whether or not this domination If you haven’t noticed that Google+ pages are increasingly becoming a part of Google search results, you may have noticed Google and Twitter’s increasingly public spat about it.

Twitter argues that by promoting Google+ in search results, Google isn’t providing the most relevant social results. Meanwhile, Google has implied it would promote more pages from Twitter if it had adequate permission to do so. Twitter general council Alex Macgillivray then tweeted an example of why he thought Google’s new results were inefficient: Google search results for the search term “@WWE” — yes, with the “@” symbol — that did not include the organization’s Twitter page.

Now Google has confirmed to Mashable that it has never indexed the “@” symbol. In other words, the search engine has never recognized a Twitter handle when it was formatted that way.

So while a search for “WWE Twitter” still returns the organization’s Twitter feed before its Google+ page, “@WWE” returns the same results as “WWE” — in this case, with Google+ results first. Somehow a search for “+WWE” succeeds in returning a Google+ profile.

But really, Google? The company with a car that drives itself? In more than five years of people searching for Twitter handles, you never got around to adding the @ symbol to your index?

Even without the @ sign being indexed, however, the concern over the results for “@WWE” are valid: About 24,900 people have +1ed or added WWE to their circles on Google+ — but 792,642 people follow WWE on Twitter. In this case, and many others, the Twitter page is a more relevant social result than the Google+ page. Twitter ranks higher than Google+ for the WWE in Yahoo, AOL and Bing results.

On the other hand, Twitter and Facebook haven’t necessarily made it easy for the search engine to feature them in results. Facebook denies Google’s crawlers access to its private pages, for one obvious reason — they’re private. Twitter includes “nofollow” links on its pages that make it hard for Google’s crawlers to index them.

As Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan has pointed out, Google has indexed at least 3 billion pages. But Twitter users create 200 million Tweets every day that would be hard to index without access to the network’s firehose — access to which Google lost with expiration of an agreement last July.

In the end, exactly how Google search results came to be dominated by Google+ pages — either as a result of having little access to other social networks or by intentionally ignoring them — isn’t that important. The important question is whether or not this domination is good for consumers.

Bookmark It

I would suggest lowering your keyword density if it is over 5%. And remember to count singular and plural versions as the same word as Google has changed their search techniques.

Follow me on my facebook

Bookmark It

A good keywording system takes time and thought and can not be constructed in haphazard fashion with expectations of great results. If you create and apply keywords well, the result is faster, more fruitful file searches.

Keywording systems fall into either one of two styles.

Most commonly used, although not always the best, is the open vocabulary. If you look at an image and use whatever words it inspires for the keywords, you’re using an open vocabulary. One day you may keyword an image as Ship, Harbor. Entered on another day, you might have keyworded the very same image as Boat, Port. Another time you might use Watercraft and Harbour.

When searching for this sort of image, who knows what you’ll find or overlook because of inconsistencies in an open vocabulary. Of course, you can look for all entries that contain Harbor or Port or Anchorage or Boat or Ship or Vessel, but it’s hit or miss proposition that requires a vast patience or a good memory. If you find no entry for Boat, you must keep looking, trying other words in your keywords. When you discover Ship, you move on, never discovering all the others that got listed as Watercraft.

In a controlled vocabulary your keywords are limited to a specific set of words. Ideally this list of words is printed in an index or available on a computer for your reference as you apply keywords to images.

As you make entries in your controlled vocabulary system, you should have the option to add a new keyword. If you fail to find a satisfactory keyword for an image, add a new one to fill the hole. This way the keywords build slowly and thoughtfully as need arises. You are spared the monstrous task of building an entire keywording system before you know what you might need.

One long list of all of your keywords makes the task of locating and applying them impossible. Within your keyword index, you’re going to want levels of keywords; categories and sub-categories. Use the primary categories to quickly make significant distinctions within the subject matter. Use sub-categories to make quick breakdowns within the category and add additional sub-categories as needed, but don’t get carried away. Generally three or four levels are as far as you should go. A good breakdown makes it easier to add keywords efficiently and makes the searching easier too.

Suppose your files have lots of animal images. Start with a general category, Animals or Nature or Wildlife. Now, let’s say you have lots of bears among your animals. Try a sub-category, Bears. Use yet another level for details to get down to the fine points, Brown, Grizzly, Kodiak, Polar… and so on. These details are hardly suitable for any other category or sub-category.

A category, Birds, could have sub-categories of types of birds, maybe Eagle is one. details for Eagle might be Bald, Golden and haliaeetus leucocephalus. If you’re tempted to include details like Flying, Egg, Hunting and such, remember, these details apply to many birds. Flying, Egg, Hunting and such might serve better as sub-categories of Birds and not just Eagles.

Limiting the number of choices increases the accuracy of new entries and expedites searches but don’t be so extreme in avoiding new terms that you diminish coverage. A happy medium exists, but it’s up to you to decide where it is.

When keywording an image, look at it and think about what it really shows. What is significant in the image? Look for both the literal and the conceptual significance. A single image is likely to fit into multiple categories and sub-categories, so don’t think you need to apply one set of terms and that’s it. Most images contain a literal subject such as a dog playing in snow. Such an image would obviously earn keywords such as Dogs, Collie, Pets, Winter and Snow. Conceptual keywords for the same image might be Cold, Joy and Freedom. Resist keywording every object that happens to be in the shot; Door, Tree, Mailbox and so on unless they play a significant enough role that someone searching for those objects would really want to see this one too.

For efficiency, use the most basic, generic terms. Don’t use your keywords to show off your vocabulary skills. Your keywords should be kept to a level that is appropriate for your audience. If your images are for osteologists and paleantologists by all means use terms like zygomatic arch and optic foramen. Don’t expect the rest of the world to know what these terms mean though.

Reduce synonyms to the single most suitable word for a category or sub-category. This narrows rather than expands your search vocabulary list. For instance, here is a list of synonyms: precipitation, condensation, downpour, deluge, cloudburst, torrent, rainfall, shower, drizzle, sprinkle, monsoon, plus all their plurals. Rather than create a category, or even a sub-category for each and every one, use a broader term, such as Rain.

And finally, be sure of your spelling. Typos and spelling errors cause images to be missed in searches. Get it right in your master list and make sure to stay with it.

Good captions and keywords enhance the value of your images. An excellent image that never turns up in appropriate situations is a lost cause. Keywording is an important part of successfully bringing your images to market.

Bookmark It

Whenever a user publicly shares a link on Google+, an annotation will show up under that link when it appears in a friend’s search results. For example, if I share a Mashable article about Google+ eliminating pseudonyms publicly on my Google+ page, users who have added me to their circles will see a note that I shared that link if they stumble upon it in Google Search.

Google+ now joins Flickr, Twitter, Quora and Google Buzz as other inputs for Google’s Social Search product. Social Search debuted in 2009 at the Web 2.0 Summit, partly as a response to Bing’s integration with Facebook and Twitter. Social Search highlights what links your friends are sharing on the web and returns results it believes are relevant based on your friends’ interests.

Social Search integration is only the beginning for Google’s plans for combining its search engine and social network. Google intends to revive real-time search with Google+ data and will launch a search engine for Google+ posts. Of course, the tech giant did the same thing with Google Buzz, and we all know what happened to that product.

Please comment and let us know about your thoughts about this article.

Source: http://www.freeseosemtraining.com/google-plus-social-search.htm

Bookmark It

These suggestions represent the largest potential performance wins for the least development effort. You should address these items first: Leverage browser caching, Combine images into CSS sprites, Minify JavaScript.

Medium Priority

Medium priority. These suggestions may represent smaller wins or much more work to implement. You should address this item next: Defer parsing of JavaScript.

Low Priority

These suggestions represent the smallest wins. You should only be concerned with these items after you’ve handled the higher-priority ones: Minify HTML, Prefer asynchronous resources, Specify a cache validator, Optimize images, Remove query strings from static resources, Specify a Vary: Accept-Encoding header.

What is Page Speed Score?

The Page Speed Score indicates how much faster a page could be. A high score indicates little room for improvement, while a lower score indicates more room for improvement. The Page Speed Score does not measure the time it takes for a page to load.

I’m hoping that today’s article will help you understanding Google Page Speed Online Tool.

Bookmark It

“Woke up today, to a lovely surprise of one of my main websites, the one that I consider my baby, has dropped from a 5 to a 3. Massive kick in the balls, after years of hard work.”

What Ifi Says:

—–googlebot is crawling my website like mad since yesterday —–

“My crawl rate also sky rocketed in the last day or two. It went from very low (relative to site average) to the highest I’ve seen in 3-4 months. Very strange.”

What Stphen Says:

“pr updated for my site from 4 to 3″

What Keliman Says:

“I see google UK been demoted to pr7 from pr8 also seen some sites go up to pr8. My own site went from 1 to 3 and another site from 4 to 3. Not that it means anything but i think the measures here are a little optimistic, my site that raised has no links in the last 2 years the site that dropped has had some great links … Hey ho business as usual.”

It seems that the changes are made into a google Algo. Its an update which has been calculated a month ago. This change is very similar to the last change. It means that Google still considering healthy backlinks pointing to a website but either considering content quality. I have seen drops on the websites those are not equipped with the quality content, also seeing there is a big drop of backlinks. So its just a normal change which has been found on different google servers. Sites from UK got good reputation and went to a good PR. Asian sites going down from a good PR. Overall its a drop in keyword ranking, also drops in PR and Backlinks, too.

Tips to Remeber:

Bookmark It

I have been researching around the years for better ways of attracting web visitors to a particular site and found many ways. Some of the rules we need to follow is keeping users trend in mind. Here is a simple rule to success on the web:


Make your site useful and then tell people about it. That’s not so complicated, really. Figure out how your site can be useful to people and then find as many ways as possible to let people know about it. You’ll use the search engines, of course, but you should be using other methods, too. Remember, the search engines are not the only way to get people to your site. In fact, many Web sites have succeeded without using the search engines as their primary method of attracting visitors to the site. It’s unlikely that search engines were a large factor in Amazon’s success — Amazon grew rapidly mainly because of the enormous press attention it received, beginning in 1994. Today, I’d bet that relatively few people arrive at Amazon.com through the search engines. Rather, they already know the Amazon brand and go straight to the site, or they go through the hundreds of thousands of Amazon affiliate sites.

Many successful companies have done little or nothing to promote themselves through the search engines, yet they still turn up at the top when you search for their products or services. Why? Because their other promotions have also helped to push them higher in the search engines, by creating thousands, even tens or hundreds of thousands, of links to them around the Internet. There have been different techniques moving around, but still experts are in a process of searching more ways to get success on the web. Like in 1994, people usually talk about link building, cool websites, etc. Similarly in year 2000 people were looking for unique and textual contents. I’d like to add here that the textual contents means the contents with full of information. And then communities picked up the local attraction, visitors more likely to visit communities based websites. But I’m still saying that content is a king, no matter it is unique but useful for an individual.

Bookmark It

2. Keyword Location — Put a paragraph containing your keywords
towards the top of your page (or at least at the beginning of your
content) . Also put the keyword phrase in your title and meta
description. Don’t over stuff your page with the keyword phrase.
Overuse can hurt you here.

3. Number of Words on the Page – Keep this around 350 words. You
can still rank well for pages that don’t have this many words, but
remember the search engines love content and 350 words seems
to be the magic number.

So there it is. 3 quick tips that you can use to get better search
listings. You can also use the free article spinning tool to
re-purpose your content for more than one search phrase. Don’t try
to have one page rank for more than one search term. It’s much
easier to just create a new page specifically tailored to the
search term you researched in tip 1.

Bookmark It

GETTING LINKS FROM .EDU AND .GOV SITES

MYTH – .gov and .edu backlinks are not 5x more powerful than a .com backlink. A Link Is A Link. It just so happens that many .gov and .edu are high pagerank.

site:.edu inurl:wp-login.php +blog
site:.gov inurl:wp-login.php +blog
site:.edu “your keyword”
site:.gov “your keyword” -”you must be logged in” -”comments are closed”
site:.edu “no comments” +blogroll -”posting closed” -”you must be logged in” -”comments are closed”
site:.gov “no comments” +blogroll -”posting closed” -”you must be logged in” -”comments are closed”
site:.edu “powered by expressionengine” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.gov “powered by expressionengine” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.com “powered by expressionengine” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.org “powered by expressionengine” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.edu “Powered by BlogEngine.NET”site:.edu inurl:blog “post a comment” -”comments closed” -”you must be logged in” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.gov “Powered by BlogEngine.NET”site:.edu inurl:blog “post a comment” -”comments closed” -”you must be logged in” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.com “Powered by BlogEngine.NET”site:.edu inurl:blog “post a comment” -”comments closed” -”you must be logged in” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”
site:.org “Powered by BlogEngine.NET”site:.edu inurl:blog “post a comment” -”comments closed” -”you must be logged in” “ADD YOUR KEYWORD”

FINDING WORDPRESS BLOGS TO COMMENT

“powered by wordpress” your keyword
“powered by wordpress” “your keyword” (this is looking for an exact keyword match with the quotations around keyword)
“powered by wordpress” intitle:your keyword This targets pages that have your keyword in the url of the page.
“powered by wordpress” inurl:your keyword
FINDING TYPEPAD BLOGS TO COMMENT

“If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account” your keyword

FINDING BLOGSPOT BLOGS TO COMMENT

site:blogspot.com your keyword
If many of the blogs have the comments section closed, you can exclude those from your searches using the following search commands:

“powered by wordpress” your keyword -comments are closed

FINDING DIRECTORIES (in your niche) AND SUBMISSION SITES

intitle:add+url “your keyword”
intitle:submit+site “your keyword”
intitle:submit+url “your keyword”
intitle:add+your+site “your keyword”
intitle:add+site “your keyword”
intitle:directory “your keyword”
intitle:sites “your keyword”
intitle:list “your keyword”

FINDING FORUMS (in your niche) FOR BACKLINKS

“Powered by SMF” your keyword
Phbb your keyword
“powered by IPB” your keyword
MyBB your keyword
“powered by PunBB” your keyword
“Powered by Phbb” your keyword
“Powered by vBulletin” your keyword

GET A TON OF QUALITY BACKLINKS FROM SQUIDOO

site:squidoo.com “new links plexo” “add to this list”
site:squidoo.com “your keyword” “add to this list”
Many don’t know this, but Squidoo has some really high PR lens’ and they allow you to add your own incoming links with anchor text and description. Pretty much all are do-follow and require no moderation. Make sure you are logged in to your squidoo account so you don’t spam, because you will get banned if you do spam. Click on “Add to this list” Module and enter your url, anchor text and description.

Bookmark It

ITA, based in Cambridge, Mass., is the brainchild of MIT graduates who figured out a way to use algorithms and technology to change the way people booked flights online and searched for cheaper fares. It has relationships with major airlines all over the world, and it also provides services to travel agencies and search engines, as described above.
Jeremy Wertheimer, president, CEO, and co-founder of ITA, said his 500-person company basically takes information distributed by airlines regarding flight schedules, prices, and seat availability, and publishes that to its partners. Those partners include major travel search sites such as Hotwire, Kayak, Orbitz, and start-up Rearden Commerce, all of which will face a more difficult competitive position, if this deal goes through: it’s not clear whether Google will continue to provide ITA’s services to those partners.


Google said it plans to use ITA’s technology in its Web search tools and to allow potential passengers to shop for tickets right from Google. Travel search makes up a huge portion of Google searches, but it’s a complicated type of search to express in a query box, Marissa Mayer, Google’s vice president of search products and user experience, said on a conference call following the announcement of the deal.

“Google has already come up with new ways to organize hard-to-find information like images, newspaper archives, scholarly papers, books, and geographic data. Once we’ve completed our acquisition of ITA, we’ll work on creating new flight search tools that will make it easier for you to search for flights, compare flight options and prices, and get you quickly to a site where you can buy your ticket,” Mayer said in a blog post accompanying the announcement.

As it did subsequent to acquiring AdMob, Google prepared a Web site highlighting the benefits of the deal for users and downplaying any anticompetitive effects. Google CEO Eric Schmidt said he expects “a significant review” from federal regulators, who tend to take a closer look at just about anything Google does these days, and who are unlikely to miss this chance to exert some pressure on Google, following the Federal Trade Commission’s decision to let the $750 million AdMob deal go through.

Bookmark It